Increasingly complex challenges like climate disruption and pandemics require more than just traditional government institutions and elections. Instead, healthy and effective governance needs to function as an ecosystem: interconnected, interdependent, and dynamic. Taking an ecosystem approach to governance would allow us to dream and act together in ways that will better serve us now and into the future.

First Principles of Healthy Governance

First Principles of Healthy Governance

Governance designed as an ecosystem can provide more agency and greater well-being for individuals, collectives, and the natural world. Our research surfaced five mutually supporting elements of an effective governance ecosystem:

  1. Being Together - pathways to strengthen and improve connectivity to each other, to future generations, and to nature.
  2. Working Together - pathways to increase our individual and collective agency over the issues that affect our lives.
  3. Weaving Together - pathways to help us respect and interweave our different values, identities and stories.
  4. Deciding Together - pathways to create trustworthy and legitimate decision-making processes and structures.
  5. Caring Together - pathways to strengthen and improve the social compact.
For example

Whatever specific form these processes take, we believe they work together as a dynamic ecosystem of governance, addressing the changing people, context, problems, and opportunities existing in any specific locale. For example, a community struggling with unprecedented severe storms triggered by climate change might:

  1. Use a customized digital platform to bring citizens, elected officials, businesses, and community organizations together with current scientific data to share information and ideas (Being Together process); that would feed into a:
  2. Process designed to crowd-source options for making the community more resilient to floods and other extreme weather-related events (Working Together process); that would be strengthened by a:
  3. Process that addresses the divides, mistrust, and strained relationships existing between the diverse racial, ethnic, and socio-economic groups that have been historically marginalized in the community (Weaving Together process); and that:
  4. Provides better input and strengthens the legitimacy of decisions taken by their local town council (Deciding Together process); which in turn:
  5. Improves the ability of the community’s social service agencies, businesses, community organizations, and religious institutions to mitigate the more extreme effects of the severe weather, especially for vulnerable parts of their community (Caring Together process)

Goals of Healthy Governance

Goals of Healthy Governance

Common themes resonated across the First Principles that point to key outcomes that healthy governance systems should produce. As with the First Principles, these goals are interconnected—working towards one goal inevitably relies on and impacts the others:

  1. Holistic Well-being - people’s well-being as individuals and with each other, future generations and nature.
  2. Inclusive Belonging - people’s confidence that they are cared for and have a legitimate place and say in governance.
  3. Maximal Participation - the ability of all who wish to participate in governance processes to do so meaningfully
  4. Distributed Power - the ability of people to affect the issues they care about.
    Trustworthy Facilitation - trusted assistance that allows diverse groups to deal with complex problems.
  5. Adaptable Governance - dynamic governance structures capable of coping with changing issues and people.
  6. Healthy Information Ecosystems - trusted means for sharing, accessing and understanding quality information.
  7. Responsive Guardrails - mechanisms that foster pro-social behavior and responsible digital spaces.
For example

For example, a community struggling with unprecedented severe storms triggered by climate change might build an ecosystem of governance based on the First Principles for healthy governance (e.g., being, working, weaving, deciding and caring together.) If successful, this ecosystem would accomplish the following gains for the community:

  1. Strengthen people’s holistic well-being so that they are more likely to have the time, skills, and energy to engage with this issue and achieve;
  2. Maximal participation in climate mitigation efforts. But this maximal participation will require (or will be advanced by):
  3. Healthy information ecosystems so people have good information on which to make decisions;
  4. Trustworthy facilitation so that the processes they participate in are well run;
  5. and responsive guardrails to make wide participation safe and respectful;
  6. In turn, this increases people’s sense of safety and feeling that they have a legitimate place and sense of kinship with other participants (inclusive belonging). This emotional commitment and quality of participation distributes power to more people on climate related matters, and;
  7. Taken together this creates adaptable governance that is able to cope with a rapidly changing issue, which, in turn means that the system better supports people’s holistic well-being.
This site has been optimized for desktop viewing only

Protect the right to have our basic social and economic needs met.

Pathway
5I

Having our most basic needs met is one of the necessary precondition to fully participating in governance (as described in 2F); codifying this as a right will provide us with legal recourse if our governance systems fail to provide an effective safety net.

ADDITIVE PERSPECTIVES

Research into the correlation between people’s ability to meet fundamental social and economic needs and cognitive capacity has found that financial hardship not only lowers a person’s mental capacity but also decreases the size of their brains. Poverty and the accompanying struggle to stay afloat consumes so much brain capacity that poor people are left with very little brainpower to devote to other parts of their life.

As a result, they are more prone to making mistakes and poor decisions, which often further compounds their problems. Thus, for people to meaningfully participate and make sound governance decisions, their basic needs must at least be met and protected. (Source: Science and SCAN)

ADDITIVE PERSPECTIVES

A healthy system of governance should provide adequate mechanisms that enable the protection of basic social and economic needs. For instance, Colombia's Constitution of 1991 created the “Action of protection/guardianship”-Acción de Tutela in Spanish- that enabled citizens to protect their fundamental rights -such as education, healthcare, freedom of speech, life, among others- when they are violated or threatened by the action or omission of a public authority or certain individuals.

These mechanisms should be within reach of individuals and communities that do not have easy access to the judicial system (e.g. if they live in rural, remote, and/or isolated communities for example), by improving civic and digital infrastructure that can effectively safeguard these rights. (Source: Jorge González)

ADDITIVE PERSPECTIVES

While it is important to have laws that protect fundamental social and economic rights, it is equally important to create responsive avenues of redress for times when enforcement is not done right. A new governance system could increase access to these mechanisms of redress by creating local courts and justice houses that can resolve conflicts and ensure that provision and protection of rights is provided swiftly using the local community rules and resources. (Source: Jorge González)

How might we...

ensure that governments can meet their safety-net obligations in a fluctuating financial climate?

Continue reading