The Ecosystem
of Governance

The Ecosystem
of Governance

Increasingly complex challenges like climate disruption and pandemics require more than just traditional government institutions and elections. Instead, healthy and effective governance needs to function as an ecosystem: interconnected, interdependent, and dynamic. Taking an ecosystem approach to governance would allow us to dream and act together in ways that will better serve us now and into the future.

First Principles of Healthy Governance

First Principles of Healthy Governance

Governance designed as an ecosystem can provide more agency and greater well-being for individuals, collectives, and the natural world. Our research surfaced five mutually supporting elements of an effective governance ecosystem:

Being Together - pathways to strengthen and improve connectivity to each other, to future generations, and to nature.
Working Together - pathways to increase our individual and collective agency over the issues that affect our lives.
Weaving Together - pathways to help us respect and interweave our different values, identities and stories.
Deciding Together - pathways to create trustworthy and legitimate decision-making processes and structures.
Caring Together - pathways to strengthen and improve the social compact.

Whatever specific form these processes take, we believe they work together as a dynamic ecosystem of governance, addressing the changing people, context, problems, and opportunities existing in any specific locale. For example, a community struggling with unprecedented severe storms triggered by climate change might:

Use a customized digital platform to bring citizens, elected officials, businesses, and community organizations together with current scientific data to share information and ideas (Being Together process); that would feed into a:
Process designed to crowd-source options for making the community more resilient to floods and other extreme weather-related events (Working Together process); that would be strengthened by a:
Process that addresses the divides, mistrust, and strained relationships existing between the diverse racial, ethnic, and socio-economic groups that have been historically marginalized in the community (Weaving Together process); and that:
Provides better input and strengthens the legitimacy of decisions taken by their local town council (Deciding Together process); which in turn:
Improves the ability of the community’s social service agencies, businesses, community organizations, and religious institutions to mitigate the more extreme effects of the severe weather, especially for vulnerable parts of their community (Caring Together process)

Goals of Healthy Governance

Goals of Healthy Governance

Common themes resonated across the First Principles that point to key outcomes that healthy governance systems should produce. As with the First Principles, these goals are interconnected—working towards one goal inevitably relies on and impacts the others:

Holistic Well-being - people’s well-being as individuals and with each other, future generations and nature.
Inclusive Belonging - people’s confidence that they are cared for and have a legitimate place and say in governance.
Maximal Participation - the ability of all who wish to participate in governance processes to do so meaningfully
Distributed Power - the ability of people to affect the issues they care about.
Trustworthy Facilitation - trusted assistance that allows diverse groups to deal with complex problems.
Adaptable Governance - dynamic governance structures capable of coping with changing issues and people.
Healthy Information Ecosystems - trusted means for sharing, accessing and understanding quality information.
Responsive Guardrails - mechanisms that foster pro-social behavior and responsible digital spaces.

For example, a community struggling with unprecedented severe storms triggered by climate change might build an ecosystem of governance based on the First Principles for healthy governance (e.g., being, working, weaving, deciding and caring together.) If successful, this ecosystem would accomplish the following gains for the community:

Strengthen people’s holistic well-being so that they are more likely to have the time, skills, and energy to engage with this issue and achieve;
Maximal participation in climate mitigation efforts. But this maximal participation will require (or will be advanced by):
Healthy information ecosystems so people have good information on which to make decisions;
Trustworthy facilitation so that the processes they participate in are well run;
and responsive guardrails to make wide participation safe and respectful;
In turn, this increases people’s sense of safety and feeling that they have a legitimate place and sense of kinship with other participants (inclusive belonging). This emotional commitment and quality of participation distributes power to more people on climate related matters, and;
Taken together this creates adaptable governance that is able to cope with a rapidly changing issue, which, in turn means that the system better supports people’s holistic well-being.

This site has been optimized for desktop viewing only

About

The First Principles were developed from a two-year inquiry of 56 interviews with a diverse group of people, ranging from economists to social activists, ecologists to technologists, academics to architects, business-people to policy makers, and indigenous wisdom practitioners to civil servants around the world.

An inductive, ground-up approach was taken to analyze the interviews, and two separate and parallel coding processes where conducted:

‍

For each interview, the team pulled out a series of prescriptive statements. A total of 339 statements were coded and then grouped into 40 Pathways. Finally, these Pathways were clustered into five main groups that have been termed as First Principles: Being Together, Working Together, Weaving Together, Deciding Together, and Caring Together. These First Principles represent what the interviewees saw as key elements, or processes, needed for a healthy system of governance in a digital age.
To minimize internal biases, a second mixed-methods analysis was conducted in which a group of external experts conducted a textual analysis involving coding the interview texts to identify both general and specific problems and solutions put forth by the interview subjects. This was followed by a Natural Language Processing (NLP) analysis, in which the coding categories developed in the textual analysis served as inputs into a machine learning-directed process to provide an additional perspective on the content of the interviews. The manual coding and NLP analysis also bolstered the outcomes of the First Principles analysis.

The First Principles are not intended as specific recommendations nor are they the result of a comprehensive literature review or deep quantitative analysis. The value in the First Principles and associated insights is in the diversity of thoughtful voices that produced them.

‍