Increasingly complex challenges like climate disruption and pandemics require more than just traditional government institutions and elections. Instead, healthy and effective governance needs to function as an ecosystem: interconnected, interdependent, and dynamic. Taking an ecosystem approach to governance would allow us to dream and act together in ways that will better serve us now and into the future.

First Principles of Healthy Governance

First Principles of Healthy Governance

Governance designed as an ecosystem can provide more agency and greater well-being for individuals, collectives, and the natural world. Our research surfaced five mutually supporting elements of an effective governance ecosystem:

  1. Being Together - pathways to strengthen and improve connectivity to each other, to future generations, and to nature.
  2. Working Together - pathways to increase our individual and collective agency over the issues that affect our lives.
  3. Weaving Together - pathways to help us respect and interweave our different values, identities and stories.
  4. Deciding Together - pathways to create trustworthy and legitimate decision-making processes and structures.
  5. Caring Together - pathways to strengthen and improve the social compact.
For example

Whatever specific form these processes take, we believe they work together as a dynamic ecosystem of governance, addressing the changing people, context, problems, and opportunities existing in any specific locale. For example, a community struggling with unprecedented severe storms triggered by climate change might:

  1. Use a customized digital platform to bring citizens, elected officials, businesses, and community organizations together with current scientific data to share information and ideas (Being Together process); that would feed into a:
  2. Process designed to crowd-source options for making the community more resilient to floods and other extreme weather-related events (Working Together process); that would be strengthened by a:
  3. Process that addresses the divides, mistrust, and strained relationships existing between the diverse racial, ethnic, and socio-economic groups that have been historically marginalized in the community (Weaving Together process); and that:
  4. Provides better input and strengthens the legitimacy of decisions taken by their local town council (Deciding Together process); which in turn:
  5. Improves the ability of the community’s social service agencies, businesses, community organizations, and religious institutions to mitigate the more extreme effects of the severe weather, especially for vulnerable parts of their community (Caring Together process)

Goals of Healthy Governance

Goals of Healthy Governance

Common themes resonated across the First Principles that point to key outcomes that healthy governance systems should produce. As with the First Principles, these goals are interconnected—working towards one goal inevitably relies on and impacts the others:

  1. Holistic Well-being - people’s well-being as individuals and with each other, future generations and nature.
  2. Inclusive Belonging - people’s confidence that they are cared for and have a legitimate place and say in governance.
  3. Maximal Participation - the ability of all who wish to participate in governance processes to do so meaningfully
  4. Distributed Power - the ability of people to affect the issues they care about.
    Trustworthy Facilitation - trusted assistance that allows diverse groups to deal with complex problems.
  5. Adaptable Governance - dynamic governance structures capable of coping with changing issues and people.
  6. Healthy Information Ecosystems - trusted means for sharing, accessing and understanding quality information.
  7. Responsive Guardrails - mechanisms that foster pro-social behavior and responsible digital spaces.
For example

For example, a community struggling with unprecedented severe storms triggered by climate change might build an ecosystem of governance based on the First Principles for healthy governance (e.g., being, working, weaving, deciding and caring together.) If successful, this ecosystem would accomplish the following gains for the community:

  1. Strengthen people’s holistic well-being so that they are more likely to have the time, skills, and energy to engage with this issue and achieve;
  2. Maximal participation in climate mitigation efforts. But this maximal participation will require (or will be advanced by):
  3. Healthy information ecosystems so people have good information on which to make decisions;
  4. Trustworthy facilitation so that the processes they participate in are well run;
  5. and responsive guardrails to make wide participation safe and respectful;
  6. In turn, this increases people’s sense of safety and feeling that they have a legitimate place and sense of kinship with other participants (inclusive belonging). This emotional commitment and quality of participation distributes power to more people on climate related matters, and;
  7. Taken together this creates adaptable governance that is able to cope with a rapidly changing issue, which, in turn means that the system better supports people’s holistic well-being.
This site has been optimized for desktop viewing only

Tolerate the uncertainty that comes with allowing variability, so governance can be more responsive.

Pathway
2H

Our expectation for governance need to account for the reality that one size does not fit all - and never will.Processes and structures will need to be customized at the local level; along with an expectation of ongoing change described in 5E, developing an expectation of responsive variability will allow governance systems to be as adaptable as we need them to be, as described in 4G.

ADDITIVE PERSPECTIVES

Following a national directive to make education policy decision-making as local as efficiently possible, village members take over the management of the local schools.

Community members, come up with several ideas that improve the wellbeing and performance of students. Since they are not sure what interventions would work best, they decide to choose a few to start with, observe the outcomes, and make decisions on whether to tweak, abandon, or install new interventions based on the evidence and data gathered.

Given that this process takes years and requires a lot of experimentation and iteration to arrive at the best local education policy, the community members, parents, students, and teachers in the village create quarterly wellbeing sessions to talk about how the changes are working and how they are dealing with the uncertainty that comes with the new changes.

ADDITIVE PERSPECTIVES

The city of Pontevedra in Spain started implementing a car-free policy since the late nineties. Despite initial protests and harsh opposition during the first couple of years from the local communities, the city’s quality of life has improved considerably: air-pollution has been reduced by 67%, there has not been a road-related death in over a decade, 15,000 people have moved to the city since it became car-free, and 7 out of 10 kids go to school walking or using their bikes. Over 20 years later, Pontevedra is considered a global example of sustainable mobility. (Source: Politico)

ADDITIVE PERSPECTIVES

Whatever ‘ideal’ indicators we create, they cannot be always a one-size fits all approach, especially in complex issues.

For instance, different indicators have been created to measure the levels of corruption at the country level. These indicators tend to measure the quantity - usually with a range from 0 to 100 - instead of the qualitative patterns that lead to corruption in particular countries.

However, the inherent complexity and variability in practices like corruption requires us to think about this issue as a bundle of qualities instead of an aggregated quantity that tends to opt for the binary view of describing states as “corrupt” or “non-corrupt”. This "bundle of qualities" approach can lead to innovative questions and more responsive approaches to tackle complex problems like corruption. (Source: Yuen Yuen Ang)

How might we...

allow for greater variability in the implementation of governance without undermining confidence?

Continue reading