Increasingly complex challenges like climate disruption and pandemics require more than just traditional government institutions and elections. Instead, healthy and effective governance needs to function as an ecosystem: interconnected, interdependent, and dynamic. Taking an ecosystem approach to governance would allow us to dream and act together in ways that will better serve us now and into the future.

First Principles of Healthy Governance

First Principles of Healthy Governance

Governance designed as an ecosystem can provide more agency and greater well-being for individuals, collectives, and the natural world. Our research surfaced five mutually supporting elements of an effective governance ecosystem:

  1. Being Together - pathways to strengthen and improve connectivity to each other, to future generations, and to nature.
  2. Working Together - pathways to increase our individual and collective agency over the issues that affect our lives.
  3. Weaving Together - pathways to help us respect and interweave our different values, identities and stories.
  4. Deciding Together - pathways to create trustworthy and legitimate decision-making processes and structures.
  5. Caring Together - pathways to strengthen and improve the social compact.
For example

Whatever specific form these processes take, we believe they work together as a dynamic ecosystem of governance, addressing the changing people, context, problems, and opportunities existing in any specific locale. For example, a community struggling with unprecedented severe storms triggered by climate change might:

  1. Use a customized digital platform to bring citizens, elected officials, businesses, and community organizations together with current scientific data to share information and ideas (Being Together process); that would feed into a:
  2. Process designed to crowd-source options for making the community more resilient to floods and other extreme weather-related events (Working Together process); that would be strengthened by a:
  3. Process that addresses the divides, mistrust, and strained relationships existing between the diverse racial, ethnic, and socio-economic groups that have been historically marginalized in the community (Weaving Together process); and that:
  4. Provides better input and strengthens the legitimacy of decisions taken by their local town council (Deciding Together process); which in turn:
  5. Improves the ability of the community’s social service agencies, businesses, community organizations, and religious institutions to mitigate the more extreme effects of the severe weather, especially for vulnerable parts of their community (Caring Together process)

Goals of Healthy Governance

Goals of Healthy Governance

Common themes resonated across the First Principles that point to key outcomes that healthy governance systems should produce. As with the First Principles, these goals are interconnected—working towards one goal inevitably relies on and impacts the others:

  1. Holistic Well-being - people’s well-being as individuals and with each other, future generations and nature.
  2. Inclusive Belonging - people’s confidence that they are cared for and have a legitimate place and say in governance.
  3. Maximal Participation - the ability of all who wish to participate in governance processes to do so meaningfully
  4. Distributed Power - the ability of people to affect the issues they care about.
    Trustworthy Facilitation - trusted assistance that allows diverse groups to deal with complex problems.
  5. Adaptable Governance - dynamic governance structures capable of coping with changing issues and people.
  6. Healthy Information Ecosystems - trusted means for sharing, accessing and understanding quality information.
  7. Responsive Guardrails - mechanisms that foster pro-social behavior and responsible digital spaces.
For example

For example, a community struggling with unprecedented severe storms triggered by climate change might build an ecosystem of governance based on the First Principles for healthy governance (e.g., being, working, weaving, deciding and caring together.) If successful, this ecosystem would accomplish the following gains for the community:

  1. Strengthen people’s holistic well-being so that they are more likely to have the time, skills, and energy to engage with this issue and achieve;
  2. Maximal participation in climate mitigation efforts. But this maximal participation will require (or will be advanced by):
  3. Healthy information ecosystems so people have good information on which to make decisions;
  4. Trustworthy facilitation so that the processes they participate in are well run;
  5. and responsive guardrails to make wide participation safe and respectful;
  6. In turn, this increases people’s sense of safety and feeling that they have a legitimate place and sense of kinship with other participants (inclusive belonging). This emotional commitment and quality of participation distributes power to more people on climate related matters, and;
  7. Taken together this creates adaptable governance that is able to cope with a rapidly changing issue, which, in turn means that the system better supports people’s holistic well-being.
This site has been optimized for desktop viewing only

Empower planetary action and decision-making institutions.

Pathway
4H

Given the scope of our global challenges, we need the ability to make decisions and take action at a planetary level; we need planetary institutions able to redress wrongs and guide actions that no local governing body could do alone. Developing these institutions should be done collaboratively, to ensure that they are collectively trusted and empowered.

ADDITIVE PERSPECTIVES

In 2040, a planetary guardianship council has been set up as the top most global decision-making body that also oversees the management of shared common resources such as forests, air, oceans, soil, and water.

By setting up of a series of groups that maximize the participation of both individuals and organizational bodies, the council is able to convene experts, communities that are most affected by an issue, and other interested caretakers to make decisions on each issue being discussed; coordinate action between the different local, national and regional bodies involved; and monitor the implementation and outcomes of the different interventions across the world. (Source: Santa Fe Futuring Session)

ADDITIVE PERSPECTIVES

World Wide Views is a global citizen consultation initiative that aims to bridge the gap between citizens and policymakers at a global level by aggregating insights from ordinary citizens on complex international issues. By having citizens from diverse backgrounds deliberate about the same policy questions on the same day in multiple countries across the world, the initiative hopes to get a cross-sectional understanding of public opinion from people who will be directly affected by the decisions.

So far, World Wide Views has been used for consultations on global warming (4000 participating citizens from 38 countries), biodiversity (3000 participating citizens from 25 countries), and climate & energy (10,000 participating citizens from 76 countries). (Source: World Wide Views)

ADDITIVE PERSPECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic represents a global challenge that revealed several weaknesses in our institutions and systems at the planetary scale. For instance, much evidence has underlined the absence of trustworthy and timely guidelines from authorities at the height of the pandemic, which led to increasing levels of distrust and disinformation. If public health officials and institutions at the national and international levels would have been able to work together and focus on explaining transmission mechanisms and keeping the public updated with the ongoing research, the levels of harm and distrust most likely would have been reduced.

Empowering planetary institutions in a way that grapples with problems and collectively guides our decision-making process is a key lesson that we should take from the pandemic. By doing so, we can have a more trustworthy and less polarized environment for future global challenges. (Source: Zeynep Tufekci)

How might we...

incentivize different global governance systems to create and empower planetary governing bodies?

Continue reading